• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

new van insurance

Page 2 - Passionate about caravans & motorhome? Join our community to share that passion with a global audience!
The problem is that from an insurers point of view a caravan is economically repairable if the cost of the repair will be cheaper than the replacement cost in these cases. Possibly the underwrites would take a generous view and replace but I have no experience of any claim at this level with the CAMH so cannot be sure how they would act, but it is a possibility particularly with the cheaper policies where cost are shaved to the bone. I think this is mainly theoretical, as getting damage that costs between the current value of the caravan and its replacement price is very unusual.
As I understand it they will leave you to negotiate for the new caravan provided you get a decent deal and will allow you to buy something different if need be if you decide to upgrade if you pay the difference in cost.
Isn’t this why we pay a hefty extra premium for New for Old? Surely the your principle doesn‘t arise in motor insurance? I can envisage hundreds of smashed up cars being repaired , as such repairs will highly unlikely reach the new purchase price🤔
I concede a lot of motor policies give you an extra where by if the car is less than one year old a brand new replacement is given.

The Caravan policy I have isn’t underwritten that way. In the immortal words of the Prof I shall have to ask the Insurer. Thanks for your input Ray , stimulates the old grey cells👍
 
Yes Dusty.

I certain that if a policy states "New for old" there will be qualifying statements in the T&C's, and as caravan insurance does not have a set of statutory minimum legal requirements (like car insurance) the insurer will apply their own unique T&C's. For that reason you cannot assume two independent insurers will have exactly equivalent policies.
 
One of our neighbours ended up with a bill of over £5,000 when their dog was ill and a friend f my daughters had to have hers put down as she could not afford the vets bills so I do understand.
 
Not sure how that happened, but that was meant to be a reply on the thread about insurance and the cost of pet insurance. Old age and senility is my excuse.
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Back
Top