Nov 11, 2009
23,029
7,791
50,935
1030 this morning we drive by our local church and there was a lady lying in the ground, half her body on the kerb, half on the road. There were three people around her and she was covered in some blankets. Driving home at 1210 she was still there as she was when I drove to the HRC. at 1420. Coming back from the HRC at 1450 an ambulance had just pulled up.

I don’t know the circumstances but nearly 4.5 hours to wait for medical attention tells me there’s a lot more work required to get the NHS back to par.
 
Nov 30, 2022
1,531
1,391
2,935
A while back we we were at a walking group lunch at a pub, one of the members had what appeared to be a stroke. So I rang for an ambulance, explained exactly what the symptoms were and asked how quickly they could get an ambulance to us as we were, at most, a 5 minute car journey from A & E, so if the ambulance was going to take longer I would bundle the lady into my car and take her there to save time.

Despite much cajoling the call handler simply refused to tell me "We cannot give out that sort of information" being the constant reply to my pleas.
Why not asks me, I am trying to do the very best for this patient, just tell me if it's going to be here quicker than me taking her to hospital myself. A simple enough question, or so I thought. But no, I was just met with the same pathetic answer. Whilst attempting to talk some sense into the operator I heard a siren approaching, which happiky turned out to be "my" ambulance (in double quick time I thought)

But what a ludicrous situation to be in, a simple "I cannot get an ambulance to you for 15 minutes" or whatever would have enabled me to make an informed decision and get the lady to A & E with minimum delay as time is critical in regards to treatment for a stroke.

I am glad to say the lhe lady made a 95% recovery from her stroke, but would the end result have been so good if I had waited and the ambulance had taken 20 minutes???
 
Nov 6, 2005
8,321
2,830
30,935
A while back we we were at a walking group lunch at a pub, one of the members had what appeared to be a stroke. So I rang for an ambulance, explained exactly what the symptoms were and asked how quickly they could get an ambulance to us as we were, at most, a 5 minute car journey from A & E, so if the ambulance was going to take longer I would bundle the lady into my car and take her there to save time.

Despite much cajoling the call handler simply refused to tell me "We cannot give out that sort of information" being the constant reply to my pleas.
Why not asks me, I am trying to do the very best for this patient, just tell me if it's going to be here quicker than me taking her to hospital myself. A simple enough question, or so I thought. But no, I was just met with the same pathetic answer. Whilst attempting to talk some sense into the operator I heard a siren approaching, which happiky turned out to be "my" ambulance (in double quick time I thought)

But what a ludicrous situation to be in, a simple "I cannot get an ambulance to you for 15 minutes" or whatever would have enabled me to make an informed decision and get the lady to A & E with minimum delay as time is critical in regards to treatment for a stroke.

I am glad to say the lhe lady made a 95% recovery from her stroke, but would the end result have been so good if I had waited and the ambulance had taken 20 minutes???
I'm surprised they wouldn't give you that information - a couple of years ago I fainted when I stood up too quickly (to chase a cat!) - my wife and a neighbour called for an ambulance and were told they were under extreme pressure so could they take me to hospital themselves, which they did.
 
Jul 18, 2017
14,809
4,485
40,935
When OH had an issue, they were around within the hour however on arrival at A&E she was kept in the ambulance for 8 hours!
 
Jul 18, 2017
14,809
4,485
40,935
So two paramedics and an ambulance unable to respond to emergencies for 8 hours. 🤦‍♂️
If we add up all the occasions in 2022 that she spent trapped in the ambulance we are probably looking at over 30 hours. Every time was a life threatening emergency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jcloughie
Nov 16, 2015
11,537
3,757
40,935
When I thought my wife had a stroke at 08:30, I quickly assessed her and gave her an Aspirin, and called 999. The ambulance was with us withing 10 minutes, I can drive to the hospital in 20 minutes. She spent all day in Hospital having checks. Very grateful.

But when I thought I had a heart attack, at 07:00 ambulance car and Ambulance arrived withing 15 minutes, checked me over, Thankfully Not a heart attack but wanted me to go to A and E, for further check, go under your own transport as we have another call.
Turned out to be Gall Bladder, 3 days in Hospital after surgery next day.
There are reasons our Ambulance services cannot get to us.
 
Jul 18, 2017
14,809
4,485
40,935
When I thought my wife had a stroke at 08:30, I quickly assessed her and gave her an Aspirin, and called 999. The ambulance was with us withing 10 minutes, I can drive to the hospital in 20 minutes. She spent all day in Hospital having checks. Very grateful.

But when I thought I had a heart attack, at 07:00 ambulance car and Ambulance arrived withing 15 minutes, checked me over, Thankfully Not a heart attack but wanted me to go to A and E, for further check, go under your own transport as we have another call.
Turned out to be Gall Bladder, 3 days in Hospital after surgery next day.
There are reasons our Ambulance services cannot get to us.
The main reason is that hospitals were built for a smaller and younger population and can no longer cope with the increase in population and aging people.

Our local hospital spent millions renovating an existing building to increase the size of the A&E. As a walk in patient, you need to go down a long flight of steps equivalent to one floor. If you are disabled you need to go to the far end of the car park to access the ramp.

However they still have the issue of patients stacked up in corridors in A&E because no beds are available hence the ambulance is tied up with a patient in it and cannot go out on calls. Very sad state of affairs!
 
Nov 6, 2005
8,321
2,830
30,935
Last time I was at A&E, ambulances were stacking up outside, unable to admit because A&E couldn't move patients onto wards who in turn couldn't discharge patients who needed care "packages"

We may talk about the NHS being broken but in reality it's the care system that's broken and causing a "log-jam" throughout the NHS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hutch
Jan 20, 2023
1,124
964
2,435
Being young-ish (55) and quite fit I've never had the NHS experiences that some of you have had. However, today, I tried to make an appointment at the doctors (sinus pain for 2 weeks), the first available appointment is with a nurse, 5 weeks away! I dread to think what the service will be like in a few years when I start to need it more.........
 
Jul 18, 2017
14,809
4,485
40,935
Last time I was at A&E, ambulances were stacking up outside, unable to admit because A&E couldn't move patients onto wards who in turn couldn't discharge patients who needed care "packages"

We may talk about the NHS being broken but in reality it's the care system that's broken and causing a "log-jam" throughout the NHS.
I don't think the NHS is broken at all, it cannot cope with a population that has increased in size since the hospital was first built. Worcester hospital is a fairly recent build, but since it was built the population has increased considerably.

It did not help that they closed down the hospital in Kidderminster which is now mainly used for consultations. That hospital had some very modern facilities that were removed and taken to Worcester hospital in the late nineties and it now no longer has an A&E. A person requiring A&E now has to travel to Worcester a considerable distance when it is an emergency!
 
Nov 11, 2009
23,029
7,791
50,935
Last time I was at A&E, ambulances were stacking up outside, unable to admit because A&E couldn't move patients onto wards who in turn couldn't discharge patients who needed care "packages"

We may talk about the NHS being broken but in reality it's the care system that's broken and causing a "log-jam" throughout the NHS.
Social care is one that since 2010 no one has had the courage to pursue despite grandiose sounding statements.

My daughter is a mental health nurse who has worked with the elderly for many years. She told me that in our trusts area the local authority social care staff are trying to put customised at home care packages in place for people who cannot cope with carers and at best would need a 24 hour live in carers. This is cheaper than a care home placement. So whilst there are places in care homes the patients fit enough to discharge are retained in hospital. The failure rate of in home care is not good unless the patient has close by relatives or friends that can supplement the cares.

So where my BIL is looked after only 28 of 41 rooms are occupied. Nett result is that his annual fee is nearly £80k and rumours are the home (a charity) could close.

I really feel that sorting out social care is a vital step to helping the NHS get back on its feet.
 
Last edited:
Mar 14, 2005
18,494
3,776
50,935
I don't think it's easy to place blame on any single part of the NHS's organisation for the way events and circumstances have evolved and left us with such apparent chaos and long waiting times we seem to be seeing.

The provision of Health Care across all settings is a very complex set of procedures, and successive governments have all failed to fully understand the extent and cost of providing what we have come to expect.

When the NHS was created in the 1940's the population had a very different demographic, to today, and the expectations of the public were also very different. In practice much of the medical knowledge was still fairly primitive, and the Dr's may have had a name for a condition, but they didn't necessarily know how to proactively cure it.

One of the strengths of the NHS was it had the critical size and funding to start more research and to produce better outcomes for many conditions, but it also means it has now identified many more conditions which through developments it can now treat. This has widened the scope of the NHS and as is so often the case these new procedures and medicines all add to the cost burden on the NHS. And it has increased the public's expectations of what the NHS might be able to do.

A&E and Hospitals are just steps in the critical healthcare system,
and they are dependant on systems and procedures outside of their direct control to allow them to function effectively. "Bed blocking" is often cited as being a major restriction for the admission of critically ill patients. This is where the hospital is not satisfied the discharge route for a patient has been properly facilitated to receive the patient with their post discharge needs. This process actually falls on the local authority over which the hospital has no directive control.

We also have to recognise the demographic of the population has changed, partly due to the success of the NHS, the UK population as an increasing number of older people and as anyone ages they are more likely to need medical help so the burden on healthcare is increasing.

As Oc has pointed out the social care system (again local authority based) needs both a massive injection of funding and a more cohesive management that can quickly bring the necessary resources and support to meet post discharged patients short and long term needs.

Whilst these would be great interventions, there are still other needs to be addressed to bring down the pressure on the A&E and hospitals in terms of the numbers of minor conditions that present at the emergency departments rather than being handled more effectively by local service distributed across the population such as GP Surgeries, Pharmacies, heath centers, or even minor injuries facilities. locally, rather than centrally.
 
Jul 18, 2017
14,809
4,485
40,935
A weird abnormality. A doctor coming from South Africa can walk straight into a job in the UK. A GP from the UK going to work in South Africa would not have enough qualification to practice as a doctor and would be required to undergo more training.

A friend of ours from Johannesburg who is a qualified Doctor migrated from SA to the UK to work in the NHS. hHe worked here for 3 months before moving on as his argument was how to can you diagnose a patient properly in 10 minutes which was the time allocated for each patient. The last I heard was that he had a successful practice in the states.
 

Mel

Moderator
Mar 17, 2007
5,839
1,835
25,935
There are massive structural issues in the NHS and Social Care that need an expensive root and branch reorganisation.
However, the problem is that no one wants to face the grim reality that demand is always going to be near infinite and resources are finite. We expect more and more from our health and care systems and the realities of a generation ago of illness and death are no longer acceptable.
That is not to say that things could not be very much improved, but until it is accepted that infinite demand is impossible then restructuring will always eventually fail.
Mel
 
  • Like
Reactions: otherclive

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts