Does anyone know of better rear coil springs for vauxhall mokka IE same height but coil metal thickness more , can you use vauxhall vivaro van /camper coil springs
Last edited:
I'd vote for MAD springs as well - I fitted a set of their auxilliary springs on my Vauxhall Astra, which was towing at 97% - the springs made it very stable both solo and towing - they're not cheap but the best.I have used MAD spring assisters on two cars, a Saab 9000 and Skoda Superb estate. They were the type that sat inside the cars own springs. On both cars there was a slight increase in ride height if about 12mm as the spring assisters give a small increase due to their pre load. If they didn’t have pre load they would rattle. Fir some cars MAD supply replacement springs with a progressive spring rate. On both my cars that had spring assisters there was no discernible difference when driving unloaded solo. But they improved the towing posture and driving with the caravan in tow.
It should not be necessary to fit spring assistor's to any normal tow vehicle. Spring assistor's must never be used to compensate for a faulty vehicle
If you believe the rear of your car is depressed too much when towing, before even considering spring assistor's, check tyre pressures, and that you are not actually overloading the rear axle of the car, All the load limits for the vehicle are stamped on the vehicles data plate, usually on one of the door pillars. Also check for damage to any of the suspension components.
The car manufacturer has done all the necessary testing and calculations, and provided none of their limits are exceeded and there is no damage or wear on the cars tyre or suspension, that car will sit within their designed limits.
Do remember that some manufactures actually derate the load capacity in the rear luggage area of a vehicle if it is towing, so check what you are actually loading the car with, including the trailers nose load.
There are other reasons why its important not to mess with suspension settings, If your car has stability safety systems, it will almost certainly have body sensors which monitor the cars height and ride, and if you fit spring assistor's, you may compromise the vehicles safety systems.
Most people who decide to fit spring assistor's do so for appearance rather than safety.
Don’t forget to notify your insurers. Mine just noted it and no additional charges.Thank you all , looking at link to mad link & think these will be the one's
Reviewed in PCI have used Grayston assisters(rubber doughnuts between the coils) on my last 4 tow cars (all same make model) with just over a 1m overhang they are pretty much essential due to the leverage imposed by the distance between tyre contact and towball.
The maximum permissible rear axle load applies whether towing or solo. It’s no higher when towing.I think that manufacturers design for everyday users and most do not tow.
John
The maximum permissible rear axle load applies whether towing or solo. It’s no higher when towing.
4 cars all fitted with Grayston's, each run for at least 3 years without any incident.
If there was an "issue" with such things I think they would have been made illegal by now. Each car has passed numerous MOT'S with them fitted, so the tester was clearly happy with them.,
As for the dampers because that's what they are, they do not "absorb" any shock they damp out spring oscillation. They function over the entire movement range from an inch to the total range.
When my Forester had a rear spring failure I fitted Pedders (Australian) replacement coil over springs. These are custom designed springs encircling shock absorbers. They were different from the OEM fitting as the Pedders had progressive springs able to take full vehicle loading and shock absorbers whose only function was to damp movement. The OEM arrangement shared the vehicle load between the springs and shock absorbers. As the latter had a hydraulic pump function that took part of the load and self levelled the car. So effectively by fitting Pedders units I sacrificed the self levelling function. It didn’t cause any issues as the springs were superior to OEM ones, and tge HID headlights still took their self levelling inputs from transducers on the rear suspension arms. My gen 1 Sorento had a similar self levelling system by Sachs, but that stood the test of time and caravans.Grayston rubber spring assisters imo should be treated with great caution. Understanding their principle of operation scares me.
In effect they halt about 20% of the coil spring movement . Yes they stiffen the suspension but increase the load movement on the remaining spring which can cause premature spring failure. The shock absorber obviously doesn’t function as normal due to the restricted movement. This can add unknown stresses to the suspension mountings etc.
The MAD approach is reasonable but maybe replacing the shocks too with “self levelling” ones may be beneficial. But as the Prof said be sure the on board cars sensors are not affected.
I had a Discovery 2 with supplementary air suspension which along with repeated cylinder head issues led me to say to my wife as I left fir Melbourne “ get rid of that heap of ****”. Bought a generation 1 Kia Sorento and didn’t look back. 😃Reading this it seems air suspension has its advantages. I never felt the need to fit additional springs to any of my previous vehicles which never had air suspension, but MAD springs do have advantages.
When it was working did you find that the actual tow was comfortable?I had a Discovery 2 with supplementary air suspension which along with repeated cylinder head issues led me to say to my wife as I left fir Melbourne “ get rid of that heap of ****”. Bought a generation 1 Kia Sorento and didn’t look back. 😃