Its invariably members who have some knowledge on the subject that complain when the responses go into some detail. It seems they forget that at some point in time, they too did not have the knowledge and would have needed a more detailed response, which contributed to their present understyanding.
As Parksy has pointed out no one is forced to read posts, and so its best to skim over them if you don't want to be spoon fed. But its also worth remebering this is a forum that can be read by anyone, and there could some who happen to find jewel in the wisdom offered.
Also just becasue a short stock answer may be given, it doesnt mean its automatically right. There are many aspects of caravannimg that have traditional responses associated with them, yet given changes in law, and or technology, those stock answers may no longer be the best advice. Good debating does no one any harm, adn it might blow some of the old myths out of play.
As Parksy has pointed out no one is forced to read posts, and so its best to skim over them if you don't want to be spoon fed. But its also worth remebering this is a forum that can be read by anyone, and there could some who happen to find jewel in the wisdom offered.
Also just becasue a short stock answer may be given, it doesnt mean its automatically right. There are many aspects of caravannimg that have traditional responses associated with them, yet given changes in law, and or technology, those stock answers may no longer be the best advice. Good debating does no one any harm, adn it might blow some of the old myths out of play.
