- Mar 14, 2005
- 18,396
- 3,676
- 50,935
Unfortunately the Elddiss document is very clear, The 10yr body integrity head line is then detailed by it being linked specifically to the failure of seams, and as the warranty is offered by the manufacturer they can limit it in anyway they wish.
A crack in a a panel is breach of integrity, but its not a seam failure and thus by Elddis's definition its falls outside of teh integrity warranty terms and conditions.
It is interesting that the dealer has reported other similar failures, which begins to point to a design, construction or material failure, and that could be important, but as the caravan is now 4 years old it also fall out side of the manufacturers 3yr warranty.
All hat is left is the possibility of action under the CRA which has effect up to 6 years from date of purchase. However it is up to the owner to establish enough evidence that the fault was either due to poor design manufacture or materials or was not sufficiently durable; which as the product ages, become more difficult.
This is where other example of the same defect appearing might be advantageous, BUT its not a forgone conclusion it will be enough to get a court to agree the crack is the same fault and not been caused by other wear and tear.
A crack in a a panel is breach of integrity, but its not a seam failure and thus by Elddis's definition its falls outside of teh integrity warranty terms and conditions.
It is interesting that the dealer has reported other similar failures, which begins to point to a design, construction or material failure, and that could be important, but as the caravan is now 4 years old it also fall out side of the manufacturers 3yr warranty.
All hat is left is the possibility of action under the CRA which has effect up to 6 years from date of purchase. However it is up to the owner to establish enough evidence that the fault was either due to poor design manufacture or materials or was not sufficiently durable; which as the product ages, become more difficult.
This is where other example of the same defect appearing might be advantageous, BUT its not a forgone conclusion it will be enough to get a court to agree the crack is the same fault and not been caused by other wear and tear.