What a change from a boy racer to a gentleman!Yes me too. (Now edited my error).
What a change from a boy racer to a gentleman!
We will never know.Not really a change, but rather a correction to my post.
We will never know.
Ok then.
Let me put it another way.
Which do you think would be the safest option.
1 - hold back, keep below the legal limit and let the speeding caravanner press on and pose a risk to others due to their outfit potentially becoming unstable.
2 - try to overtake them and in doing so exceed the posted speed limit, (and for what purpose anyway).
I think sensible people would go for option 1
Any how, I have no intention on getting into a willy wanging competition over this.
Same here, I don't hang around in the outside lane/s. I don't know what Colin (my son's FIL) was thinking of, except he's recently gone back to towing after a couple of years driving a motorhome, maybe he 'forgot'.I just could not imagine going into the third lane unless the inner ones were blocked. Even second lane I try to get back to inner one soon as possible.
Try being a pedestrian in London and use the new priority rules. You will very quickly have an accident.Who may use lane 3, and the various speed limits that apply to different vehicles and combinations are all in the Highway Code. I think one of the problems with peoples poor driving habits is they probably haven't read it since passing their driving test and are unaware of the current regulations and guidance.
Of course, this isn't limited to caravanners. For example, I guess not many drivers know that pedestrians have priority at junctions. Fortunately, not many pedestrians know either, or I am sure the accident rate with pedestrians at junctions would be higher and traffic at busy urban junctions would grind to a standstill, as every individual pedestrian crossed as soon as they reached the curb.
I used to have a black Mercedes Vito with removable seats and windows in the back. Because of the seats and windows, it was legally allowed to do 70 on a dual carriageway, but I got a ticket for just that when I got stopped without the seats in, despite showing the officer the seat fixing tracks and rear seatbelts, and there being no load in the van. Admittedly my fault, I should have know better, but the lack of common sense in the rules and their enforcement is annoying.Try being a pedestrian in London and use the new priority rules. You will very quickly have an accident.
White van man are the ones without knowledge of speed limits on dual,carriageways.
I had a Minivan with no windows. It was restricted to a lower maximum speed than if it had had windows or been the estate version. I think in those days it was 40 mph on A roads. To install windows would have cost workshop and parts fees, plus a duty would have had to be paid So eventually I changed it for a Humber Hawk.I used to have a black Mercedes Vito with removable seats and windows in the back. Because of the seats and windows, it was legally allowed to do 70 on a dual carriageway, but I got a ticket for just that when I got stopped without the seats in, despite showing the officer the seat fixing tracks and rear seatbelts, and there being no load in the van. Admittedly my fault, I should have know better, but the lack of common sense in the rules and their enforcement is annoying.
How could you possibly know if you were not there? Speeding is a hazard in its own right, and its illegal.I’m pretty confident Beachball didn’t create a hazard by doing 77mph rather than 70 mph.