I would go for the red one, A lot more weight for towing the Wyoming.I am truly torn now. Is it the yellow or red one
🤔🤔🤔
Pass. It’s a left hooker🤣🤣🤣🤣Surely man of your standing would have the one below, .There are some from around 80 years earlier but would lack the required creature comforts.
View attachment 1563
Its no secret that nuclear waste is highly dangerous, but by volume it is far less than what would be produced by other forms of fossil fuel generation. It's waste products aren't spread like other forms of carbon combustion its far more contained and closely managed.Seems that the idea is to bury it? Surely that would be harmful to the environment and IMHO not a very good idea for future generations? Not sure if nuclear is more friendly to the environment than gas or coal stations?
Where on earth do you get your totally incorrect information from?Okay was wondering why you brought that up when my posts revolved around nuclear waste. Climate change has been happening for thousands of years so no big deal, but pollution may be accelerating it and nuclear waste is pollution on a grand scale along with wind and solar farms.
I'm not a fan of nuclear becasue if the "If there's a loss of containment. I'd much prefer a less costly but equally relatively clean alternative that can carry the base load of our electrical supply. Renewables are great but are dependant what nature throws at us. Tidal power would be more reliable, but still not necessarily available when its needed.I remain concerned.
Tony Blair scrapped all Nuclear power stations. We visited Sellafield and enjoyed the tour explaining all the hazards and why it was being decommissioned. Made good sense then.
Now new HMG and Nuclears back. Hinckley Point is costing circa £22 Billion. It’s being built by the French. I expect they will have the key to turn off as they will, note their intentions with Jersey’s supply. 🤬🤬
All the eco nuclear disasters have been mentioned before. How truly clean is clean and cost. £22 Billion!!
An increasing number of homes across Britain already have rooftop solar panels.....One solution could be for every property to have local storage for its own needs, that's topped up when power is available, and has the capacity to handle demand throughout the day.
Surprisingly few I think you'll find from my occasional visits as a teacher ie with pupils etc.
I think nuclear should be halted and abandoned-it has proven not to be safe if the worst happens Fukushima-and mother earth is never predictable and they haven't a clue what to do about waste.
I really don't understand with the history this country has , why we insist on the blinkered solar/wind approach-if we added water or hydro to this surely we'd be on a winner-most villages had a mill with very very well managed water courses powering water mills potentially 24/7. Surely we could do this-I watch the Trent running by-the power is amazing, it never runs dry-plenty of sea around too. Lord Armstrong managed it -hydro with batteries in the Victorian era-Cragside was visited by the Queen and has a modern generator now. We need to wake up! I know we have the Welsh electric mountain-amazing-done the tour-but it's a fast reaction high demand producer that then has to pump its water back up on cheap rate electricity!
Rivers don't create much electricity - the generators need water pressure, ie height.I still fail to see why-the Trent runs nearby-constant flow of water- the water board have managed to run some off to create a reservoir for Lincoln for eg-waves create constant motion-I;m not saying it is going to be a major player but as extra generation to add to solar and wind we simply aren;t doing it. There are days when solar produced v little, and sun-water might be the same, but surely we should be looking at every clean alternative. Quite a few dams around-simply add a hydro genny to the gates and do controlled flow off rather than waste it-as they do now-all completely wasted.
I still cannot see why if our Victorian friends managed to power fountains, grind flour and power hammers and mills with water power alone, we cannot at least consider this as an addition-one thing we seem to have in the UK is plenty of water!
It's worth noting the fact that Norway is way ahead of other countries in its take-up of EVs - it has lower population density, so lower need for cars - it has a high annual precipitation climate and mountainous terrain which provides huge scope for hydro-electric and pumped storage - no other country in the western world has the same combination of advantages.Hydropower is a lovely idea, and the idyllic sight of an old mill wheel turning producing power for the flour mill it's tempting to think it should produce oodles of power. Back to reality - - many flour mills could have their water wheel replaced with a 2 to 3kW motor! and if that the power the mill is capable of generating were not going to get very far running the country on it.
As Roger L points out whilst water running in a river does have some kinetic energy, it s far more if you can get some height involved, to increase the speed of the water.
There are a number of video's on Youtube from people mainly in the USA who do use modest water flows to generate power in the mountainous areas, but the need several tens of feet head to get enough kinetic energy in to the flow to be useful.
There’s precious little hydrostatic head on the Trent once it gets larger. Fir effective hydro you need storage reservoirs with a good head so they can operate in low rain conditions.I still fail to see why-the Trent runs nearby-constant flow of water- the water board have managed to run some off to create a reservoir for Lincoln for eg-waves create constant motion-I;m not saying it is going to be a major player but as extra generation to add to solar and wind we simply aren;t doing it. There are days when solar produced v little, and sun-water might be the same, but surely we should be looking at every clean alternative. Quite a few dams around-simply add a hydro genny to the gates and do controlled flow off rather than waste it-as they do now-all completely wasted.
Looks niceSurely man of your standing would have the one below, .There are some from around 80 years earlier but would lack the required creature comforts.
View attachment 1563
Archimedes screws are useful when the hydrostatic head isn’t good enough for the more conventional hydro electric schemes.FYI............electricity generation on the Thames in Oxfordshire