i am definitely old school and happy to remain soI think this forum needs to be renamed to Practically Luddites
i am definitely old school and happy to remain soI think this forum needs to be renamed to Practically Luddites
It has more strings to its bow, than just texting. Voice & video calling.
I did mention that I use Whatsapp text for contacting relatives overseas otherwise costs will be astronomical for us and them.In reply to Buckman you said you don’t text as if people can’t talk you don’t bother then you go on to say you do use WhatsApp a lot, isn’t that contradicting yourself as WhatsApp is surely just exactly texting by another name.
...AND is is end to end encrypted for speech and video calls - which incidentally are free although they use some of your data allowance.
Wow! So everyone else on the bus or train can hear my conversation or see who I'm talking to but no one will be able to decrypt the data going over the ether.
That’s a particularly jaundiced view of the current generation, which in part may be accurate but doesn’t recognise the vast majority that are just getting on with their education, work or lives.One of the problems with smart phones is that the majority of the population refuse to see them as a tool, and instead see them as their whole life. Kids arent kids anymore, instead of being out playing football and doctors and nurses they hanging around drug infested playgrounds trying to see how long it wtakes to wear out their thumbs. This is a generation that no longer speeks English, puts on an un-natural accent (dont you just hate that), cannot spell, has no social skills and even speaks in text abbreviations, such as LOL and OMG. There is a lot to hate about smartphones, but there is a lot of benefit when one remembers it is only and aid, not a living entity.
Agreed, sure both my daughters use their phones, probably more than I would like. But as parents we have set boundaries (which they try and push) and limits.That’s a particularly jaundiced view of the current generation, which in part may be accurate but doesn’t recognise the vast majority that are just getting on with their education, work or lives.
I wasn’t just thinking about my family, or those of friends or neighbours, when I said your views were jaundiced. Narrowing it down to inner city areas clearly then excludes the rest of the country from your view. But then you open it up again to the “large majority…..” and not just kids.Agreed, but you are looking towards your own families. Take a walk down an inner city housing estate one night. You wont see any artists easels being setup around the playgrounds. You will see a feral generation, and I dont blame the kids, nor their parents. Lets go back beyond them to the grandparents, the first generation that couldnt give a rats about work, decency, morals and everything else that belongs to society.
DO I have a jaundiced view, you betcha.
I come from a generation where a man would stand to let a lady sit, or open the door for her. Where you would wade in to help somebody in danger, not stand around and video somebody getting beaten just to earn yourselves a few views on youtube. Where you would earn what you had or go without. Save for it rather than get into debt.
And from a time when you didnt have to chain everything down, put wheel locks on it or trackers in it.
Does this make me a miserable old codger? I dont think so, I just have a strict moral code that I live my life by and can take pride in that. Thats something I dont see in a large majority of the younger generation, and I am not just referring to kids.
They can't with your mobile phone either!Wow! So everyone else on the bus or train can hear my conversation or see who I'm talking to but no one will be able to decrypt the data going over the ether.
I do find it astonishing that in UK we still have so many areas where mobile coverage is virtually non existent. I’ve travelled down the eastern borders of Turkey and had as much communication capability as I required, at times even picking up Iraqi and Iranian networks.I assume that most people subscribing to this thread have made their own choices whether or not to have a mobile phone or use online services. However, there are a good number of people who for various reasons cannot have access to a mobile phone, tablet , computer etc or online services. The more we are pushed to do things on line the bigger the digital divide becomes.
The pandemic provided an indication of the extent of the digital divide. With schools closed children were being taught at home and needed access to a computer, smartphone, tablet whatever and of course the internet. In our region we became aware through local charities that some families did not have access to any of this and so we organised a gathering of unused equipment to donate to those in need.
Also keep in mind that there will be regions where internet and mobile phone signals are very flaky or non-existent. I'm fortunate enough to be able to have the technology I need but the service is not always available. At home my mobile works on certains days if I hang out the window and this is frustating when security checks need to send a text message and there's no signal. Until fibre broadband was run out here the wet string implementation was equally variable. (That was a joke but with some truth as on wet days the internet would often grind to a halt)
As for Smartphones - well Smartphones designed in some cases by Dumb People - well some apps anyway . Yesterday my Sat Nav app started speaking Mandarin for no obvious reason as it was ok the day before. By the time we'd stopped laughing I was heading up Princes St in Edinburgh which is for taxis and buses only. Fortunately the lorry driver in front of me must have had the same app as he made a u-turn and I followed.
Remember technology should work for us - not the other way around.
You should have gone to the Chocolate factory near the cl site, good coverage there.I do find it astonishing that in UK we still have so many areas where mobile coverage is virtually non existent. I’ve travelled down the eastern borders of Turkey and had as much communication capability as I required, at times even picking up Iraqi and Iranian networks.
Back in 2015 we were away and one of the dogs took very ill with suspected meningitis but which type they couldn’t diagnose. She was so critical that there wasn’t time to send her to the animal hospital. So we agreed treatment. This was all done talking to the vet from Haa in Bhutan. 36 hours later she was discharged for continued care with my daughter. This time I FaceTimed our daughter and the dog heard my voice and slowly got off the softee, so we then spoke to her and she came towards our daughters phone. That FaceTime was from the Phojika Valley using a monastery overspill wifi.
Yet this May in Hutton Le Hole, a tourist hot spot, the mobile signal was so poor I had to walk around half a mile just to be able to get a text away. Good job 999 wasn’t needed as I’d be knocking up the site owner for the landline.
I guess it depends on your service provider. My walk to get a text signal took me along the footpath that is alongside the Rural life museum. Go far enough and miraculously you might get enough for a 2G type chat akin to a Stanley Unwin discourse.You should have gone to the Chocolate factory near the cl site, good coverage there.
I didn’t overlook the fact that phones roam, not that I used the Iranian or Iraqi networks, but wasn’t there a proposal here to require phones to be able to use another provider if the signal from the main provider wasn’t available? Was it business resistance or economics that prevented it? Some years ago when with BT there was a system where I could use another subscribers wifi from outside their premises providing I gave permission for my WiFi to be used similarly. It was very useful on a site just outside Tavistock where the mobile signal was non existent. But a nearby mobile home development had landlines that provided owners WiFi. So by standing outside one of the statics I had a form of useable comms.Many people overlook one thing when they say 'there is no signal.' No, there is no signal <on their system> but there may well be on others. Just look at the OfCom coverage checking site and you will see what you mean.
OC comments about coverage along the Turkish border, but he overlooks the fact that when outside the UK your phone roams. Whilst your home service provider may have a preferred SP in another country, if there is no signal from that preferred SP your phone will roam onto whatever system it can find. I know of an organisation in the UK that has Manx SIMs in their important users phones so that when not on the IoM their phones will roam and effectively (nearly) always have a signal wherever they go.
There was a call sometime ago to get UK Mobile Network Operators to work together and allow roaming within the UK. I have no doubts this is technically possible but hasn't been implemented for business reasons.
The Ofcom coverage checker is less useful in my area than the operators own coverage checkers but since both are based upon post codes they are still inaccurate in some locations.
As a First Responder I was issued with a mobile phone with an Isle of Man sim card which, as mentioned previously, would roam to provide better coverage but was still not 100%. We then got issued with Airwave radios - supposedly better coverage and with the 'promise' to fix areas not covered. It proved to be no better.
The reliance on the mobile network is getting more critical. BT want to switch to Digital Voice (VOIP) by 2025 and eliminate the conventional hard wired exchanges. Of course this means having access to fibre, which again is not 100% coverage or indeed taken up by everyone. But one major concern for our area is that Digital Voice will not work in the event of a power cut, something we regularly get, especially in winter times. Couple this with poor or no mobile signals means that emergency services cannot be contacted easily.
Under Ofcom guidance BT and other providers are supposed to provide battery back up units for use in power cuts to keep the ONT and Router alive for a minimum of 1 hour. BT are reluctant to issue these to all and sundry naturally, since many people have mobile phones, but being classed as being in a vunerable area (power cuts and no reliable mobile service) they agreed to provide them to myself and friends and neighbours FOC. Five months on I still hadn't received them and only through intervention of our local MP did BT finally decide to compensate me to get my own.
Services like broadband and mobile phones should be classed as utilities in much the same way as electricity is since we are being pushed more and more to use them.
Used the above to do a check and no provider offers coverage in our area. We are with Three and when you check their coverage map, it shows you can get signal outside however outside we cannot get any signal. I have to drive out of the village to a small hill. We are about 8 miles from Worcester town!The Ofcom coverage checker is less useful in my area than the operators own coverage checkers but since both are based upon post codes they are still inaccurate in some locations.