Sat at work, and getting ever more annoyed at the dross that evades my junk mail catching program. So far today I`ve had 53 different unwanted crap forwarded to me.
A couple of years ago a French politician suggested charging for sending e-mails and received hate mail and death threats, so didn`t pursue it. Well, I`m sorry but he was right.
If we all had to pay a nominal amount (pick a number - say a tenth of a penny) to send an e-mail would it really make any difference to you or who you work for? Cream the money off for `good causes` I.E not Tonys dome or the London Olympics, give to hospices (hospii?) or lifeboats or something equally deserving.
At least then the toe-rags sending me viruses or offering a wonderful job if I give them my bank details or increasing my penis length or Viagra or, or,or etc would have to pay for the priviledge of invading my privacy. They might be less keen to flood the system with thousands or millions of crap e-mails if they were to lose more than they could potentially gain.
I haven`t sussed out the mechanics, but for me it would be a vote winner.
A couple of years ago a French politician suggested charging for sending e-mails and received hate mail and death threats, so didn`t pursue it. Well, I`m sorry but he was right.
If we all had to pay a nominal amount (pick a number - say a tenth of a penny) to send an e-mail would it really make any difference to you or who you work for? Cream the money off for `good causes` I.E not Tonys dome or the London Olympics, give to hospices (hospii?) or lifeboats or something equally deserving.
At least then the toe-rags sending me viruses or offering a wonderful job if I give them my bank details or increasing my penis length or Viagra or, or,or etc would have to pay for the priviledge of invading my privacy. They might be less keen to flood the system with thousands or millions of crap e-mails if they were to lose more than they could potentially gain.
I haven`t sussed out the mechanics, but for me it would be a vote winner.