The "goods" I referred to was your caravan which you clearly stated was 6 just six weeks from purchase, and so is still well within the terms of the CRA with your seller.
As you should also be well aware of is the CRA covers all retail contracts and that includes physical goods but also services collectively these can be referred to a "products".
If you sign up to an extended warranty that is a "product" supplied by the warranty company, and as such that contract is also subject to the CRA.
We need to be careful here without going off at a tangent.
A Warranty of any sort is still subject to CRA.
The Seller of that Warranty, Guarantee , Policy etc is subject to CRA..
We have seen hundreds of so called extended Warranties sold by the High Street Electrical Stores. Most cases have been found against the Seller for lots of reasons, primarily SOGA and the CRA.
The same is true of PPI. It was the Banks who sold the Insurers PPI policies. The Banks picked up the tab for the mis selling of the policies that weren’t worth the paper .
Similarly any policies purchased via a Broker, it is the Broker who is liable for failing to provide the correct Policy wording.
Looking at the Caravan , we all accept it is an assembly of numerous individual preassembled items, cooker fridge etc. Why are they treated differently to a water ingress warranty? IMO CRA applies across the board. I have seen nothing in the CRA that says otherwise?