It's entirely possible to utilise the magnetic field of the moon via wave power.
Or more likely via its gravitational pull creating the tides?
It's entirely possible to utilise the magnetic field of the moon via wave power.
Long form waves are created by celestial bodies, the Moon being one. Tides are a particular form of wave.Or more likely via its gravitational pull creating the tides?
Long form waves are created by celestial bodies, the Moon being one. Tides are a particular form of wave.
There's an as yet unproven theory from two French scientists working for the Atomic Energy Commission that suggests that the gravitational pull in different locations on Earth is affected by the earth's magnetic field.But, in context of my comment, is that the Moon's "magnetic" field waves being utilised?
Or less drilling if you go to the Canary Isles. ðððThe inner core of the Earth is loaded with super heat that could be tapped. Nearly 2000 miles underground . Anythingâs possible. Remember the black stuff, coalð
Hello Steve,There's an as yet unproven theory from two French scientists working for the Atomic Energy Commission that suggests that the gravitational pull in different locations on Earth is affected by the earth's magnetic field.
Clutching at straws here, but the same theory could apply to the moon. ðĪŠ
There used to be one at NEC probably one of the first in the world. Quicker to walk ðThere are Maglev trains notably the Shanghai Maglev train which has a top speed of 275mph and uses magnetism to operate. Unfortunately as the understanding of magnetism is rather sparse except for its basic function, there is a cost factor regarding making Maglev trains more economical to develop further.
Come to think of it wasn't there one at the Merry Hill shopping complex in Dudley? We saw it but it never worked. Probably due to cost cutting. LOL!There used to be one at NEC probably one of the first in the world. Quicker to walk ð
The monorail at Merry Hill, Dudley was a conventional monorail, but it used to break down a lot because it was badly designed.Come to think of it wasn't there one at the Merry Hill shopping complex in Dudley? We saw it but it never worked. Probably due to cost cutting. LOL!
The moon doesn't have a magnetic field, at least no dipolar one like the earth. What it does have is minute.It's entirely possible to utilise the magnetic field of the moon via wave power.
I didn't say it was impossible to produce and distribute hydrogen, just that right now and for the short term foreseeable future it was cost prohibitive. As you suggest - many things change over time, and once we have an abundant source of renewable energy, using some of it in an less efficient manner for the sake of some additional convenience is entirely likely. But we need the source renewable energy first.Thank you for kind words. Actually I was referring to hydrogen and it being possible distribute it in vast quantities however I guess the same would apply to research regarding the earth's magnetic field. I think every planet has some sort of magnetic field even satellites like the moon. I supposed that there is the possibility that there are some sort of magnetic fields in space, but I don't know having neve read up on it.
We have not been to Merry Hill shopping centre for nearly 20 years. Awkward to get to from where we live and secondly parking was a big issue and having to park far away even if you have a BB. Unfortunately a little too far for me to walk.The monorail at Merry Hill, Dudley was a conventional monorail, but it used to break down a lot because it was badly designed.
In a couple of years time the long promised Midland Metro will connect the Merry Hill Centre with Birmingham and black country towns.
Unfortunately it's a few years too late, people are switching to online shopping, and stores at Merry Hill are closing down.
I'm lost as to why the thread keeps getting new unrelated points being raised. This was about an electric camper van and how it might charge! not about maglevs or planetary electromagnetism or clothing sizes.
Have Maglevs been suggested as a way to power and charger EV's. Here's a heads up. As stated they do utilise the force of attraction and repulsion associated with poles of magnets, and whilst part of the system uses permanent magnets ( or uni powered electromagnets , the other part has to uses a series electromagnets which can change polar direction to generate the repulsion and attraction to both lift the carriage and produce motion. This mainly came about by Professor Eric Laithwaite's work on Linear motors.
Unfortunately the system needs electrical power to operate, so it's not a source of free energy. There are several reasons why the system has not been adopted widely. These include the cost of teh materials to create both the carriage and the track that it has to use. They are not particularly efficient, and they require a fairly complex control system which has to manage the balancing act of levitation, without oscillation in the vertical and horizontal planes as well as carriage yaw all of which become more complex to manage as speed increases. That was one of the reasons why the NEC system was so slow. Perhaps with more modern and significantly faster modern computers the carriage stability might be managed better now.
The Japanese version was a flagship project where money was no object, and it was and is expensive to operate, and it's the financial side of things that has prevented the scheme being more widely adopted.
ðððI'm lost as to why the thread keeps getting new unrelated points being raised. This was about an electric camper van and how it might charge! not about maglevs or planetary electromagnetism or clothing sizes.....
Hmm. Complete and on topic is a bit different to tangential and irrelevant. (I am definitely guilty of the former, like Prof)ððð
That's a bit rich coming from you Prof.
Think back to when a fairly straightforward question is asked on the message boards and it becomes a long drawn out discussion involving various peripheral issues.
ððð
Thanks so much for putting us straight, I never realised that there were so many forum moderators.Hmm. Complete and on topic is a bit different to tangential and irrelevant. (I am definitely guilty of the former, like Prof)
I would comment to say that I am not a moderator (as you very well know), but that would be tangential and irrelevant. ;-)Thanks so much for putting us straight, I never realised that there were so many forum moderators.
I really must try to remember this for future reference........
We forgive you because you were replying to my tangential but not entirely irrelevant response to your earlier reply which explained to us that your comments which sometimes divert from the core issue are not really tangential and irrelevant. ðI would comment to say that I am not a moderator (as you very well know), but that would be tangential and irrelevant. ;-)
The difference being the "peripheral issues" do have relevance to the topic, or are responses to other off topic comments initiated by others.ððð
That's a bit rich coming from you Prof.
Think back to when a fairly straightforward question is asked on the message boards and it becomes a long drawn out discussion involving various peripheral issues.
ððð
Some of these debates on this forum are irrelevant to real time everyday life anyway, you can argue a point about alternative energy as much as you want to but nothing written here will change things either way when it comes to governmental projects like the UK becoming carbon neutral.The difference being the "peripheral issues" do have relevance to the topic, or are responses to other off topic comments initiated by others.
How clothing sizes are relevant to electric campers is going a bit far.![]()