Just two small questions - firstly, what encouragement is there for responsible parents of well brought up-children, if instead of being welcomed into the great community of camping and caravanning, they are shunted off into some ghetto and labelled as a problem? And secondly, as everyone seems to agree that only a minority of parents and children behave in an unacceptable way (all the children in our own family circles are known to be well brought-up and well-behaved, it is only a few, who have been in their turn, observed by only a few of those who post on here, who fall short of the required standard), why is the entire population of under whatever age is considered adult - 18? 21? 25? 30? to be ostracised?
When our children were young, we found that the quiet, open sites without lots of 'entertainment' were just what we needed. When they were teenagers, we voluntarily went to 'livlier' sites, which were not necessarily to our taste, but kept them happy, and meant they were properly occupied. We only once came up against the 'adults only' barrier, when we wanted to go to a particular area because of a family wedding. We tried to book a CC site for that weekend, but they were fully booked: they recommended another site, why I do not know, because they knew we had four children and it turned out to be adult only. Had we been able to go there, they would scarcely have seen our children, as we would have spent practically the whole of the time that we were not actually asleep at our relatives' house. As it was, we had to change our plans and travel there and back on the same day, a round trip of over 500 miles.
I am all in favour of the freedom to choose - but that works both ways. Why is the freedom to choose to shut out a significant proportion of the population a more valuable right than the freedom of that group to enjoy themselves in the same way as other people? There seems to be some sort of panic going on here that demonises younger people, and I have yet to see any real justification for this.