- May 12, 2006
- 2,060
- 0
- 0
Global warming has been with us since the end of the last ice age ,how do think the ice melted,there were no cars thenGlobal warming is with us and that is a fact, we have all got our part to play in combating it, we cannot just sit back and let it happen.
I am not going to start quoting facts and figures, just google "global warming" and read about what is going on right under our noses, do not bury your heads in the sand.
If by taxation, congestion charges or by whatever means we can reduce 4x4 ownership in this country it has got to be a good thing
Exactly collinn ,you hit the nail on the headThe thing is, I wouldn't mind if I thought that punitive measures against cars would achieve anything. But they cannot and they won't.
In the current drought, people largely accepted water saving measures because supplies were very successfully conserved (according to my water supplier). Fine, a means to an end.
But with emissions, it's a totally different matter.
Look at the globe - you will see a pin prick that is the British Isles (responsible in fact for just 2% of world pollution).
If every single mode of transport and polluting industry was wiped out here, it would not make a blind bit of difference to the perceived pollution threat to the world.
"Spitting" and "into the wind" come to mind!
If there is a problem, then it can only possibly be resolved at an international level - and that means world wide agreement to cut the emissions, particularly in the US and China.
It would mean we all recognise the crisis and, OK, we've got to make sacrifices to solve it. I could live with that because it would be realistic and, as in the water, analagy would actually achieve the solution.
But in the meantime we have to suffer pointless, vicious, vindictive and mis-directed hammer blows to our pockets and to our freedom of choice...
In the meantime, car manufacturers across the world are gearing up to churn out more and more 4x4s. Not much hope of green tendency there...
In the meantime, our leaders - government, royal family, captains of industry - drive around in convoys of Jags and Range Rovers. Not much ethical conscience on view there...
In the meantime, we are urged to switch off our TV standby at nights - while in the next few weeks we will waste thousands on excessive ('excessive', I said) Christmas lights!
Funny old world...
When cornerred with the facts of the issue - the Anti's usually say that they feel "intimidated" by 4x4's.Why do you anti 4x4 people do what you do? So many non 4x4 cars will be affected by Ken's tax and are just if not more polluting. Go here to see just how many there are http://www.vcacarfueldata.org.uk/search/vedSearch.asp.
Both (one on order)of my 4x4s are not listed in Band G. There isn't any logic to your argument or your actions.
So what is it? What exactly are you against? Why on a regular basis does my LPG Discovery get vandalised?
Roy, would you trust this government to introduce a simple, fair and balanced system of any sort? Anything that Gordon Brown has a hand in is complicated - we have the most complicated tax system in the world.I wouldn't say that the writing's on the wall for 4x4's but the writing is on the wall for road pricing.
Charging us for using different types of roads at different times of day seems to be flavour of the month.
For instance using the M6 at peak time would be a whole lot more expensive than using a quiet rural road at non peak time.
This will force all of us to change our driving habits, for instance the M6 will be quieter at rush hour and all the quiet rural roads will be full to bursting.
I wonder if we will still be paying road tax??????????