- Jan 31, 2018
- 1,783
- 850
- 5,935
I am not sure of the relevance of your comments though you are totally correct-is that an excuse as to why we're slow? slower- I'm not sure we are-actually-moving too fast isn't imo a good idea-and steady development is far more sensible. Fact is regardless of how they make their electricity the government have moved to incentivise EVs as a way to reduce ice vehicles-they were just like us until moves were made to help the EV revolution-like we are beginning to find-their government are feeling the pinch in terms of reduced taxes from ice vehicles and are looking at ways to replace this-they may have better newable availability but the government have like France incentivised EVs with great success. Whether this is successful for transport is a different matter-am sitting on the fence-I think a steady move is better than Norways fast rush-for us anyway-I'm all for EVs but the infrastructure isn't good enough yet. Nor is tax and the loss of it via fuel sorted in anyway-in fact our government seem to be scared to move to an alternative-don't blame them-it wont be popular-sorry an EV convert but a fence sitter!Norway is unique - low population density and ideal terrain/climate for hydro-electric generation.
In the UK, sales of hybrids are only as high as they are due to the low BIK tax on them as company cars - the majority of which are returned after 3 years with charging cables never unpacked or used.
Last edited: