Is that the man made stuff first developed by Germany in WW2?My understanding is that clean fuel for cars is being developed,and that F1 will be using it from 2026, so still hold out hope that it will filter down to the rest of us pre 2030
Is that the man made stuff first developed by Germany in WW2?
My understanding is that clean fuel for cars is being developed,and that F1 will be using it from 2026, so still hold out hope that it will filter down to the rest of us pre 2030
Is that the man made stuff first developed by Germany in WW2?
The electric trans connectors work both ways. We import gas from Norway too, but to my mind having renewable and some nuclear does improve our security of supply and reduces the extraction, transport and burning of fossil fuels. Even electric energy costs could be independent of global prices. There are those who seem to advocate increasing our offshore production of oil and gas, but both these fuels are governed by world prices and do nothing to improve our energy supply and security. Estimates seem to predict at best an extra 3% would be extracted. To whose benefit? It’s not surprising that the changes to less reliance on fossil fuels will take a long time but aren’t they wort pursuing?I agree regarding support green energy if you can afford it, but the cost of all the wind farms, tidal etc all come at a cost . They all impact the environment in one way or the other except that the environmental damage is now in the countryside and hidden away from city dwellers who think they are doing their bit every time they have a brew. Don't we still currently need fossil fuel to generate electric?
At present we import electric from the EU so are hardly self sufficient or have security of supply and probably will not have security of supply for decades as proven very recently.
We have air source heating and if the temperature dropped below 11C it becomes ineffective and we freeze. Currently during the winter some mornings the unit resembles one gigantic ice block. It also cost us a fortune over the past year to heat our 2 bedroom home and we had lowered the temperature and turned off heating in one of the bedrooms to try and save some money. Unfortunately for some reason this then creates damp issues even though we have an extractor?
We have had issues with it in the past, but certainly better than when it was first installed. Biggest issue and worry is if we have a day or three where it is really cold and is no longer effective. This will happen with any air source heat pump. Another sort of drawback is that while hot water is being heated in early morning the temperature can drop considerabl, but probably our own fault as we always leave the bedroom window at the top open to get some sort of fresh air into the home.In our first house in Plymouth in 1973 we had electric central heating installed, it was ace in that every room had its own thermostatically controlled radiator, and the house was the split into zones, with various timer controls. So pleased to ditch the coal fire and Valor paraffin heaters. It sounds as if your CH with heat pump is a poorly designed/matched system..
Methanol derived fuels were produced prior to WW2, but a great leap forward was made by ICI in the 1960s. Some navies are building conventional submarines that are propelled using methanol in conjunction with fuel cells. Also shipping operators are also looking at the feasibility, but in the commercial market costs rule supreme and methanol or methanol derived fuels are not cheap.Is that the man made stuff first developed by Germany in WW2?
Two years ago the heat pump in the Norfolk barn took 24 hours to raise the temperature 1deg c. Water peaked at 50deg c and needed use of the electric immersion. Rubbish. But I am sure our own mini nuclear boilers or some other fantastic scientific heater will emerge. We must look beyond the horizon. Nothing we have today is particularly good but more so whatever we have must be affordable for all not the chosen fewWe have had issues with it in the past, but certainly better than when it was first installed. Biggest issue and worry is if we have a day or three where it is really cold and is no longer effective. This will happen with any air source heat pump. Another sort of drawback is that while hot water is being heated in early morning the temperature can drop considerabl, but probably our own fault as we always leave the bedroom window at the top open to get some sort of fresh air into the home.
Hi Clive.Even without climate change I would support green energy. It cuts down pollution and offers the country more security of supply plus the attraction of heating the home without reliance on gas boilers and water systems really does appeal to me
I’m really puzzled about your comment wrt “ no need for vaccines without a pandemic”. What other options would there be to tackle the various diseases that by using vaccines have been pushed back into their respective boxes IE poliomyelitis, smallpox, measles, meningitis, hepatitis etc….the list is too long to detail. Presumably you are more in favour of letting natural selection fight it out?
Interesting point: As far as I can see...Methanol derived fuels were produced prior to WW2, but a great leap forward was made by ICI in the 1960s. Some navies are building conventional submarines that are propelled using methanol in conjunction with fuel cells. Also shipping operators are also looking at the feasibility, but in the commercial market costs rule supreme and methanol or methanol derived fuels are not cheap.
Methanol Production – A Technical History | Johnson Matthey Technology Review
Global methanol production in 2016 was around 85 million metric tonnes (1), enough to fill an Olympic-sized swimming pool every twelve minutes. And if all the global production capacity were in full use, it would only take eight minutes. The vast majority of the produced methanol undergoes at...technology.matthey.com
I was only replying to Dustys post at # 77 and not advocating wider use of methanol. In fact Esso will be removing methanol from their Synergy premium petrol and replacing it with ethanol. However Increasingly, syngas, a mixture of hydrogen and carbon monoxide derived from biomass is used for methanol production.Interesting point: As far as I can see...
How much CO2 does burning 1kg of methane produce?
2.75 kg
Burning 1 kg of methanol makes 1.37 kg of carbon dioxide.
Today methane is actually produced by burning, you guessed it, methane.
Now add the CO2 produced to burn methane to get methanol and yes it is higher.
I am pretty sure if there was a desire, for next to nothing science could find ways to drastically reduce CO2 from diesel cars. But there is probably no big money to be had.
Whilst cost is going to be a factor, for any fuel, from the ecological perspective it's the energy used to produce the fuel, and the fact that even though the synth fuel may use renewable power generation to run the production process, the act of burning the fuel under pressure in an IC engine will produce a range of emissions, that not only includes CO2, but also various other Nitrous oxides and Carbon monoxide.From Clean Technica
'' A product from P1 Fuels,which uses biowaste and carbon capture to produce a viable internal combustion fuel''
Like most developments I presume that if it can be scaled up then costs would come down.
Surely the aim of bio derived synthetic fuels is to offset the carbon dioxide emissions so it’s a zero sum output. That’s what Porche are aiming for with their significant development in Chile, plus those aero engine makers that are testing synthetic fuels fir commercial flight usage. The complete cycle from production to use has to be considered not just one part of the cycle.Whilst cost is going to be a factor, for any fuel, from the ecological perspective it's the energy used to produce the fuel, and the fact that even though the synth fuel may use renewable power generation to run the production process, the act of burning the fuel under pressure in an IC engine will produce a range of emissions, that not only includes CO2, but also various other Nitrous oxides and Carbon monoxide.
Such fuels are not emission free, not energy efficient, but they may be an expensive way forward for quite specific purposes, where battery electric solutions are not tenable.
I do agree the present situation does not support the specific use case you have reported. That experience does not automatically mean EV's have no future, as a rapidly increasing number of drivers will attest.On the general issue of EV's it is pie in the sky, certainly in the next decade or two. Having completed a 2000 mile round trip van in tow to Germany I can say even if I could afford the £50/£70 K to buy a suitable EV towing car, it would not work. First problem is recharging. Reports give 200 to 300 mile range when towing as we drive. That would mean 4 charge stops on the way there and 4 on the way back.
Quote "Fast charging stations will fully charge most electric vehicles, from empty to 100%, in 4-6 hours. Big batteries of 75 kWh and up will generally take about 5-10 hours to complete charging"
So what was a 12 hour trip from home to Germany caravan park, notwithstanding all the hilly terrain we would have to spend almost twice the driving time just charging!
Next I can state with some confidence having visited a few "services" here in the UK and in Europe, if I saw 6 or so points at any spot it was a lot and NOT ONE made provision for a car with hooked up charge.
Every shopping center in Europe and for that matter only have a token 6 or 10 charging points and on top of that having visited numerous petrol stations on the trip at least 98% of cars I saw were using the pumps!
Next every recent winter we encounter the doomsday story of "possible load-shedding" due to shortage of generation capacity, god forbid we end up with a high pressure depression and all wind capacity is dead, where will all the extra power come from to charge 32 million extra EV's
Even though I do not believe the doomsday scenarios pitched by those with something to gain, the whole concept right now is laughable.
Can you fork out £50K for this ideological scam?
I for sure cannot and will buy a new petrol or diesel car just before the ban on new ones come into force.
IMO we are looking at another farce similar to that of 10 years ago-
Scrap your petrol car and buy diesel!
BTW absolutely not one EV charger at he fairly large park we stayed at and a restriction on charging EV's at your site due to inadequate electrical wiring system that was not designed for extra load!
The much derided BBC recently ran two programmes by Justin Rowlett covering topics of EV, battery production (or non production) in UK, infrastructure issues particularly connection new power sources to the grid and home heating with heat pumps/hydrogen. It covered many of the concerns that members of the Forum have raised wrt their hobby or normal life activities. Overall i found it quite Interesting, but it didn’t really address the other view that many tens of thousands of EV owners have no problem adapting to and using their EVs, and also enjoy them.I do agree the present situation does not support the specific use case you have reported. That experience does not automatically mean EV's have no future, as a rapidly increasing number of drivers will attest.
Not only are the number of EV's growing, but also the infrastructure is improving, though it's still got a long way to go. We have all become so comfortable with the way IC vehicles operate, and the infrastructure that supports them, It would be great if there were no discernable user differences, but changes of this type can't occur over night, and it will take as you say several decades for the complete changeover.
I'll not rule out the possibility that caravanning as we know it may need to change quite dramatically.
You must have shares in a fusion development then🤞🏼Anybody else remember Betamax, we have ben here so many times before, I am betting that in 30 years time people will look back on the EV hype, wind frams and heat pumps and wonder what on earth posessed us to get involved, as by then new technologies will have emerged, be too late for me anyway.
You are correct, the aim was to produce a net zero carbon dioxide, and provided the energy used to make the fuel is only sourced from renewables, then in theory it will be a net zero fuel. But the CO2 measure is a gross over simplification of the issues, to make easily understood by the public ( and politicians). CO2 is one of the most common emissions from humans activities, its relatively easily measurable so it has been used as a key indicator to scale emissions.Surely the aim of bio derived synthetic fuels is to offset the carbon dioxide emissions so it’s a zero sum output. That’s what Porche are aiming for with their significant development in Chile, plus those aero engine makers that are testing synthetic fuels fir commercial flight usage. The complete cycle from production to use has to be considered not just one part of the cycle.
Are you seriously going to try and use recycled diesel fuel😱😱😱😱....
As the nearer we get to that date I can see used deisel prices rising
Let alone Betamax, what about the zealot drive to buy diesel 10 years ago!Anybody else remember Betamax, we have ben here so many times before, I am betting that in 30 years time people will look back on the EV hype, wind frams and heat pumps and wonder what on earth posessed us to get involved, as by then new technologies will have emerged, be too late for me anyway.